Thursday, February 26, 2009

Gartner Says Consumers Are Unwilling to Sacrifice Convenience for Security, Despite Widespread Online Fraud

Two-Thirds of U.S. Consumers Surveyed Use the Same One or Two Passwords for All Web Sites

 

Although consumers claim to be concerned about security, they have little tolerance for sacrificing convenience to safeguard that security, according to Gartner Inc. Despite widespread security concerns, consumers continue to rely on service providers to protect their safety and persist in using unsafe password management practices, preferring to maintain the status quo rather than exploring new security methods.

 

In September of 2008, Gartner surveyed approximately 4,000 U.S. online adults regarding consumer Internet security and fraud issues, and ascertained their interest in various ways to manage passwords for online authentications. The results remained consistent with previous years' survey findings that show consumers prefer convenience when it comes to security features. While the data collected focused on the use and management of passwords, Gartner believes that it has implications for consumer-facing Internet sites requiring authentication and for the use of user-centric identity frameworks.

 

"Two-thirds of U.S. consumers surveyed use the same one or two passwords for all Web sites they access that require authentication," said Gregg Kreizman, research director at Gartner. "Most U.S consumers want to continue managing their passwords the same ways they do now. They don't favor using software or hardware to help manage passwords, and user-centric identity frameworks such as OpenID and information card architectures face scarce consumer demand."

 

Web site owners seeking to improve authentication are grappling with how to accomplish this task while not turning away customers; as a result, new solutions must be found to balance security and ease of use.

 

"The survey findings serve to confirm our belief that there is a limited business for identity providers to manage general-purpose consumer identities and passwords to be used to access sites across multiple business contexts, such as financial services, government and healthcare," said Avivah Litan, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. "Instead, it is more likely that these providers will have some success managing identities for limited use on multiple sites within a specific business."

 

Gartner analysts said providers have a duty to provide a compelling justification for consumers to adopt additional security measures; a change in perception could precipitate an increase in sales.

 

Mr. Kriezman said that online product and service vendors should redouble their marketing efforts to illustrate the advantages and practicality of routine and stronger authentication for consumers, and should provide appropriate pricing to encourage adopters.

 

"Enterprises with consumer-facing Web sites that require stronger controls than weak password authentication alone should continue to augment passwords with complementary mechanisms, such as device identification, geolocation and transaction verification," Ms. Litan said.

 

Additional information is available in the Gartner report "Consumers Don't Want to Change the Ways They Manage Online Passwords." The report is available on Gartner's Web site at http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_search&id=867812&subref=simplesearch.

 

Additional information and practical advice on identity access management will be presented at the Gartner Information Security Summit, taking place from June 28 through July 1 in Washington, D.C. The Gartner Information Security Summit hits the critical spot between strategic planning and tactical advice. Gartner analysts, industry experts and IT security practitioners deliver unbiased, realistic analysis of the current state of information security, as well as an independent vision of how things will evolve over the long term. For complete event details, please visit the Gartner IT Security Summit Web site at http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=749433. Members of the media can register by contacting Christy Pettey at christy.pettey@gartner.com.

 

Mr. Kreizman and Ms. Litan are also presenting at the Gartner Identity & Access Management Summit 2009, taking place in London on 23-24 March. For complete event details, please visit the Gartner IAM Summit Web site at www.europe.gartner.com/iam. Members of the media can register by contacting Holly Stevens at holly.stevens@gartner.com.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Yet another example of what happens if your bank doesn't implement IDentiWall…

 

How dangerous is online banking?

Sure, the Web makes it simple to manage your money.

 

It also makes your account easier to hack into. Here's a look at the risks and realities — as well as 9 smart tips that can help you protect yourself.

By Carolyn Salazar, MSN Money Published Jan. 28, 2009

 

Joe Lopez will never forget the day he checked his Bank of America account online and    rimages-211.jpegealized that more than $90,000 had vanished.

 

Months before, the Miami business owner had stopped making weekly visits to his local branch, opting instead to conduct his financial transactions entirely over the Internet.

 

"I absolutely thought it was safe," Lopez said. "And it was convenient."

 

What he didn't realize were the risks of online identity theft. A malicious virus had infected his computer and, in a matter of minutes, captured his user name and password — allowing a hacker to transfer $90,348 to a rogue overseas account.

 

Lopez got most of his money back months later, after a federal investigation and, eventually, a lawsuit. But his experience taught him the hard way, he says, what many experts have concluded: "Online banking is a danger."

 

Since its debut just a decade ago, online banking has become one of the fastest-growing Internet activities. Roughly 43% of people who use the Internet, or about 63 million Americans, do some banking there, according to a 2006 survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project — even more than make travel reservations online.

 

But that growing popularity has also brought increasing anxiety over whether something as private and personal as a bank account can be fully protected in the relatively unregulated and unpoliced world of the Internet.

 

"It's pretty hard not to do online banking because it is so convenient, and people want convenience," said Atul Prakash, a University of Michigan researcher who conducted a study on the risks of Internet banking. "Nevertheless, there are reasons to worry."

 

Mia Jozwick, a student at Wagner College in New York City, was duped by a "phishing" e-mail made to look like a message from her bank. Thinking it was an important financial notification, Jozwick responded by firing off her user name and password; she learned it was a scam only after someone emptied her account.

 

To make matters worse: Thieves were also able to steal her identity, because her password was her Social Security number. It took her a year and help from Identity Theft 911, a service agency, to unravel the mess she found herself in.

"It was a nightmare," she said.

 

How the scams work

 

Since the birth of electronic commerce, financial institutions have stepped up online security measures to try to make the process less vulnerable to attacks.

 

Some have spent millions adding more layers of authentication, toughening encryption schemes and going after and shutting down bogus bank sites.

 

But that hasn't stopped hackers, who continue to look for ways to exploit security gaps.

 

Among the most popular attacks are phishing schemes that duplicate bank Web sites and ask customers to log on to their accounts. Others send e-mails, purportedly from bank employees, asking for sensitive financial information. Often the two work in tandem, with an e-mail containing a link that directs recipients to a bogus bank site. Both scams are designed to steal user IDs and passwords as a customer types them in, giving a cyberthief access to the person's financial accounts.

 

Other cyberthieves embed viruses, spyware or "Trojan horses" — programs that can give thieves unauthorized access to a computer by recording and sending out a user's keystrokes. These programs allow thieves to look over your virtual shoulder as you type in sensitive financial information. Within seconds, your savings and checking accounts, even your investments, could disappear.

 

How big a problem are we talking about? The numbers are tough to pin down: Experts say there are no reliable studies showing how much money is lost through online banking alone, primarily because banks themselves can't always pinpoint the source of how a crime occurred, whether on the Web or through an ATM.

 

But various reports offer hints at the magnitude. For instance, about $3.2 billion was lost to phishing attacks in 2007, according to a survey by Gartner, a technology research firm — with about 3.6 million people losing money to these attacks over 12 months.

 

"It's a huge business," said Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant at Sophos, a spam-fighting security firm. "The scammers are literally making millions, and they can be based anywhere in the world."

 

And the attacks are increasing.

 

Take the so-called Sinowal Trojan, a virus that injects what seem like legitimate pages on someone's browser, then steals the user's log-in credentials. In probably one of the largest online banking breaches known to date, the virus has compromised 300,000 online bank accounts and about 250,000 credit and debit card accounts over the past three years, according to a study published in October by California's RSA FraudAction Research Lab — with more than 100,000 online bank accounts hit in the past six months alone.

 

And there are thousands more Trojans out there, many of them specifically targeting online banking customers.

 

"There is definitely more risk than there was one or two years ago," said Avivah Litan, a Gartner analyst.

 

She said her clients have told her they've noticed the assaults have doubled in the past six months: "The attacks are so vociferous and manipulative that even the big banks can't stop them."

 

What are the banks doing?

 

That's not to say banks are not trying. For a small fee, Bank of America — the largest online banker in the United States — recently introduced the SafePass card, a wallet-sized card embedded with a button that, when pressed, sends the customer a six-digit security code via text message. The customer can then enter the code along with his/her user name and password to access an online account. For business accounts or wealthier clients, some banks also offer SecurID, a token-like device that generates a new six-digit code every minute that users need to log in to their accounts.

 

Bank of America, along with other financial institutions, also has started an alert system advising customers by e-mail or text every time a transaction occurs. "Protecting the safety and security of our customers' information is our top priority," Bank of America spokeswoman Britney Sheehan said.

 

But not all banks offer the same level of security. "If you are going to do the bulk of your transactions online, you should really shop around to find a bank that has the best security measures," said Anthony Reyes, the CEO of New York's ARC Enterprises, which investigates computer intrusions. "But you have to also make sure you are doing everything right on your side."

 

Protect yourself

 

So should you be avoiding online banking altogether? Not so fast: There are risks associated with traditional banking as well.

 

More than three-quarters of banking fraud stems from offline factors, such as check fraud, mail theft or a lost wallet, according to the 2007 Online Banking Security Report, released by Javelin Strategy & Research, a California firm.

 

"When you're online, even though you have a lot of risks, you're more in control because you can do something about the risk — you can monitor your accounts, and you can say no to the malicious junk," Javelin President James Van Dyke said. "In the old-fashioned world, such as the paper and mail world, you can't do much to keep prying eyes from looking at those paper checks and paper statements."

 

But others point out that online crooks can target thousands, if not millions, of accounts at once, making Web banking the more lucrative target.

 

"To compromise half a million accounts, you'd have to raid millions of mailboxes — probably 20 (million) to 30 million in the mail world. But online it could take a matter of seconds," Gartner analyst Litan said. "So in terms of hit rate, online banking is not as safe."

 

Experts suggest that anyone using online banking should take these steps:

 

1. When logging on to a bank Web site, a user should look closely at the site's URL to make sure it matches the bank's name. A more secure URL will begin with "https://" and be followed by the bank name. Make sure the bank's padlock is displayed in a corner of the site before you log on.

 

2. Log on to banks only from a secure computer. Never log on from a public computer in a hotel or cafe, and be careful when logging on to unknown networks with a laptop.

 

3. If you get a warning e-mail, call your bank — don't click on any provided links.

 

4. If your computer is acting strangely — for instance, reacting slowly or getting pop-ups — avoid using it for online banking until you can get it checked out.

5. Keep anti-virus and anti-spyware software up to date.

 

6. Install and maintain a firewall.

 

7. Never respond to any e-mail that requests personal information.

 

8. Be leery of fly-by-night, Internet-only banks with high interest rates on savings or checking accounts. Make sure the bank is FDIC-certified and is insured.

 

9. And, most importantly, use a different user name and password for each financial account. The password should be complex, with numbers and symbols, and changed regularly.

 

Still, there are no guarantees.

 

"It annoys me when people say these consumers are dumb, (that) they fell for it," Litan said. "They are not dumb. These criminals are really good, and you'd have to be a total security geek to stop everything."

 

One final precaution: Know the rules. Federal regulations require that banks return money lost to electronic transactions, but the customer has up to 60 days to detect the fraud and two business days to report it. Meanwhile, different banks have their own rules — look them up before you shift your banking to the Web.

 

For Lopez, the lesson was painful. As a business owner, he had to sue his bank to try to recover the money; the case settled last year. (There are fewer federal laws covering business accounts, which have more heightened security than personal accounts but tend to have less protection against online breaches.)

 

Now Lopez is back to old-fashioned banking methods and following up his transactions with phone calls.

 

"I don't do any online banking anymore. Nothing, zero," he said. "I'm so paranoid."

Sunday, February 22, 2009

A Wolf In Your Browser's Clothing

Andy Greenberg

Web anonymity tools like Tor and Psiphon have offered users in repressive countries a valuable safeguard from Big Brother governments monitoring their broadband. But one security researcher has revealed a tool that hides users in a less innocent guise: An unwitting victim's browser.

 

Matthew Flick, the principal researcher for Tampa, Fla.-based security company Fyrm Associates, presented the program, which he calls Cross-Site Scripting Anonymous Browser, or XAB, to a crowd of researchers and hackers Thursday at the Black Hat security conference.

 

The tool takes advantage of cross-site scripting, a common bug in Web sites that takes control of a user's browser when he or she clicks on a specially crafted link, or in some cases, simply visits a compromised page.

 

The trick is typically used for stealing a user's cookies--identifying files stored by his or her browser--or creating fraudulent, data-stealing entry fields on a Web site. But Flick's XAB tool offers another application of the hack: It hijacks a user's browser to visit Web pages and relays the data to an untraceable third party.

 

By exploiting a site with thousands or millions of visitors, the XAB tool could provide a collection of hijacked browsers, Flick says. Those browsers could cover a hacker's tracks to illegal sites or hide a hacker's anonymous attacks through the Web.

 

"It would be a dynamic layer of victims that sits between the hacker and the Web and provides anonymity," Flick says.

 

Unlike a typical bot-net, which hijacks PCs with malicious software, that network of unwitting proxies wouldn't leave anything behind on victims' machines, making the attack harder to trace. "As soon as the browser is closed, the evidence is flushed away," Flick says.

 

Like most security researchers, Flick defends his release of a new hacking tool by arguing that it creates awareness of already-existing vulnerabilities. In fact, cross-site scripting may be the most common unpatched bug in the world. According to a study by Web-focused security firm White Hat Security last year, at least two-thirds of sites suffer from some form of the vulnerability.

ID fraudsters beating security: study

By Kevin White

 

Cyber security better than real world

 

The number of people falling victim to identity fraud is on the rise, a major US study has confirmed, but online fraud is deemed safe provided people use all the security controls that are to hand.

 

According to findings released today by Javelin Strategy and Research, the number of identity fraud victims has increased 22% to 9.9 million adults in the US.

 

If businesses appear unable to stop the fraudsters, they are slowly starting to get the better of them by detecting and resolving fraud more quickly.

 

The research has shown that mean consumer costs of identity fraud plummeted by 31% and stood at $496 per incident last year.

 

The researchers attribute the reduction in incident costs to fraud being detected and resolved faster, thanks to industry efforts and consumer education.

 

Javelin's assessment is one of the largest and longest-running studies of identity fraud, and has assessed the experiences of 24,000 people in the past five years. This latest study was based on phone interviews last October with 4,784 people, of which around 10% said they had been identity fraud victims.

 

It covers all types of fraud, and the figures it tracks are not limited to cyber crime. James Van Dyke of Javelin explained that "crimes of opportunity, such as information from lost wallets, still comprise the vast majority of incidents." These account for over 40% of incidents. Around one in four victims had personal identification numbers (PIN) compromised on their ban cards. Online fraud came in as being at root of around 11% of incidents.

 

One message from Javelin is that online is safer than offline, but only when consumers use all the available security controls.

 

"Once online access is secure, consumers should move financial transactions online to eliminate many of the most common avenues fraudsters use to obtain personal information and gain more control compared to traditional channels" the company said in a statement issued today.

 

Moving online includes turning off paper invoices, statements and cheques, including pay and salary statements, and replacing them with electronic versions, it advised.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Banks, customers feel the fallout of the Heartland breach

February 2, 2009 (Computerworld) In a sign of the scope of the data breach disclosed Jan. 20 by Heartland Payment Systems Inc., banks and credit unions from Maine to Washington state have begun reissuing credit and debit cards to customers.

There were also reports last week of fraudulent transactions involving cards that were compromised in the breach at Heartland, a large payment-processing firm in Princeton, N.J.

For instance, CU Community Credit Union in Springfield, Mo., said 16 compromised cards that it had issued were used to make about $11,000 worth of fraudulent purchases. "I haven't spoken to one financial institution that hasn't been affected by the breach," said Jenny Reynolds, the credit union's vice president of marketing.

Heartland has said intruders broke into its systems sometime last year and planted malware that they used to steal the card data. The number of compromised cards still isn't known. But Heartland processes more than 100 million transactions per month.

The Washington Credit Union League, a trade group in Federal Way, Wash., said some of its members have reported that more than half of their issued cards were compromised. The breach led the WCUL to push state legislators to revive a bill mandating specific data-protection controls for all merchants and third parties that process card transactions.

This version of the story originally appeared in Computerworld's print edition.